Holosun PID: An excellent weapon light!

The Holosun PID weapon light is a compact, high-performance lighting solution designed for use on firearms. It has a very bright output and the throw of that light (candela) is also excellent. Its performance is as good as lights costing two or three times as much.

One of the standout features of the Holosun PID weapon light is its durability. It is constructed from high-quality materials and is built to withstand the rigors of use on a firearm. It is also waterproof and resistant to impacts, making it suitable for use in a variety of environments.

In addition to its durability, the Holosun PID weapon light also offers excellent performance. The white light is extremely bright and has a beam distance of up to 200 meters, making it ideal for illuminating targets at longer distances. 

The Holosun PID weapon light is also equipped with a number of convenient features to make it easy to use in the field. It has a simple push-button activation system, and the brightness of the white light can be easily adjusted to suit the user's needs. It is also compatible with a wide range of mounting options, making it easy to attach to a variety of firearms.

Overall, the Holosun PID weapon light is a reliable and high-performance lighting solution for firearms. It is durable, bright, and easy to use, making it an excellent choice for anyone looking to improve their accuracy and visibility in low-light situations.

My full review video.

Sig P320 Lawsuit

A very big lawsuit got filed against Sig on 11/30/22. This one has 33 plaintiffs and alleges a lot of issues and damages. While one would expect any lawsuit filing to include as much as possible in order to state an initial case, there are some allegations in this one that, IMO, are particularly damning. 

The reason I find those allegations damning is that 4 incidents outlined were caught on video. Without this it is quite easy to make a counter claim that the owner or user of the Sig P320 was handling the gun negligently or otherwise caused the gun to discharge. If there are 4 incidents of the gun discharging without user interaction on video, that crushes any real doubt that Sig can cast on the case.

Of the 4 incidents caught on video the lawsuit mentions, I've seen two of them. The Philly SEPTA discharge video was pulled from any place I can readily find it, but when it first occurred I saw that video. There is another discharge video, and this one is currently online.

To be clear, I am a Sig P320 Armorer, and from my level of understanding, the gun should not be able to go off on its own. I have my own issues with the design, those are:

1. If the trigger/chassis assembly gets too much oil/lubricant in it, it tends to bind up and then the trigger won't reset.
2. The ejector is built into the chassis, so if you bend/break it, you've broken the actual firearm and not a part that can be readily replaced.

Back to the accidental discharges, I don't know how they're occurring. But at this rate I believe that they definitely are happening, and this isn't just poor gun handling. You couldn't pay me to carry a P320 AIWB. No way, no how would I do that. If you're issued one or forced to carry one, keep it in a big ass duty holster away from your body and don't subject it to any bumps or other bad handling if you can help it. I realize that if you're carrying a gun professionally, sometimes the nature of the job precludes being delicate with everything during various pursuits or struggles, but do what you can to minimize bumping that thing.

Black Friday Tactical Shopping!

These are items that I've either owned or used and found to work very well. They are all suitable for gifting. Some are inexpensive and some are not. For most of these items I've gone out of my way to give you options at different price points. For those of you who follow me on Facebook, you've probably seen many of these in the past, but there's a reason they keep reappearing. For any link to F3tac.com, use code GRAYDOG to get 10% off!

In no particular order:

Lanterns:

Streamlight Siege (I have one of these on every floor of my house!)

Streamlight Super Siege

Jump Box:

Gooloo GP4000 (I have jumped multiple cars with this on a single charge.)

Power Bank:

Anker Power Bank (My constant companion for years.)

Flashlights:

Fenix PD36TAC (When you say "tactical environment" this is the one that comes along.)

Streamlight Macrostream USB (Best small task light I have found)

Thrunite TN12 Pro (The lowest cost flashlight I would use for serious work.)

Knives:

Spyderco Resilience (Made overseas so lower cost, but same Spyderco quality and warranty.)

Spyderco Para (Hard use but not too big, perfect for most!)

Weapon Lights:

Streamlight TLR-7 Flex (Small, perfect user interface, and will still do tactical chores.)

Surefire X300-U (Venerable, but still the undisputed champion of tactical pistol lights.)

Fenix GL19R (Splits the difference, low cost, high output, small form factor. I'm a fan!)

Backpack:

Vertx Gamut 2.0 (Not overt, well made.)

Footwear:

Merrell Chameleon Stretch Hiking Shoes (What I wear when not at work and not formal.)

Multitools:

Leatherman Skeletool (Lightweight but still functional.)

Leatherman MUT (If you have an AR-15 this is your jam.)

Knife Sharpeners:

Worksharp Knife & Tool Sharpener (I'm going to be sharpening the Thanksgiving cutlery with one.)

Apex Edge Pro 4 System (Puts the best edge on knives, this is the one for extra fine blades.)

AR Upper:

SOLGW M4 Upper (If you want an upper that will be accurate and durable, this is your jam!)

Other Accessories:

Neomag Sentry Sling Strap (Easier sling retention for when you're not carrying the gun.)

Pistol Magazine Loader (UPLULA) (I use one and recommend one.)

Med Gear:

CAT TQ

Hyfin Chest Seal

X Shears (EMTs swear by these, cheaper and better than the raptor shears)

Eye Protection: 

Peltor Securefit

Oakley Tombstone (I wear these on the range every time.)

Misc Items:

GunVault MiniVault

Water Filtration (These are on crazy deal right now.)

Success Builds on Success

With law enforcement, the good shooters continue to get and stay good. The bad ones continue to stay bad or get worse. As with most things in life, there are exceptions, but it is rare that I see them.

What I mean by this, is that somebody that passed the academy firearms program with a 90% or better score will likely be somebody that goes shooting on their own, goes shooting with friends, takes classes, and any opportunity their agency affords them to shoot more, they will take. This is somebody that will show up to their annual/semi-annual qualification and pass everything easily on the first attempt. It is also somebody that the firearms instructors won't have to spend much time with, if any.

The opposite is definitely the opposite. The person that struggled to pass, who barely scraped by with a 70%, will likely do no practice on their own. If offered optional time to go shooting at the range, they'll have other obligations that will cause them to beg off. If they are given mandatory additional practice sessions due to their poor performance, they may call in sick on those days. If they do show up, they'll do their level best to joke around and not put in much effort. When it comes to their qualification dates, they'll typically avoid going until the last possible date, and they certainly won't put any prior preparation into trying to do better for the date they pick. Once they arrive, they'll typically bomb right out of the gate and then have to come back the next day for remedial and additional attempts. They may continue this cycle for days until they manage to scrape by with a passing score, which will certainly cause the range staff to say many hallelujahs until the next time they have to deal with that individual. Individuals like this, while being awful shooters, will invariably soak up 99% of all of the instructors' time. The instructors don't get much opportunity to help good shooters become better. They definitely get lots of opportunity to drag awful shooters across the 70% line.

I have no great fix for any of this, but I have noted some observations. Momentum is a thing, both positive and negative. It can last for a short time or an entire career. Shooting being one subset of this, but certainly a critical one in the law enforcement world. If I could, I would get every new candidate on a positive trajectory that showed them a lot of success up front, that would then in turn give them some positive dopamine hit and get them wanting to do more and better every time.

Unfortunately most law enforcement firearms training programs aren't set up to be fun, and therefore they often create a negative feedback loop. Once you convince somebody that shooting guns isn't fun, getting them out of that mindset is damn close to impossible. When somebody is set well and truly on this path, they just continue to eke out sub-par or mediocre performances on the range. And if it takes every single bit of somebody's mental effort just to pass with a 70%, I don't typically have a lot of confidence in their ability to shoot in the real world where they'll also have to contend with communicating, using cover, maneuvering, possibly having to use lighting, and even applying first aid to themselves or others, all while having to manage a complicated and rapidly evolving situation. 

I have some thoughts on how to make initial firearms training more rewarding to new recruits, but I am going to have to get it going quite gently. I also have to pick verbiage that will be politically palatable to the higher ups, because I can't spin it as "fun." Call it what you will, but I have to make it so that the recruits won't hate the work, and that may be difficult. I write this as I'm conceiving the drill card/outline for the next session. 

I should also confess that my current pass rate is quite good. Most sessions I lose no recruits due to firearms score failure. But the pass rate isn't the only metric I care about. I suspect it is the only pass rate that the higher ups care about. I want the highest scores possible, but I also want satisfaction in the students, so that hopefully they'll continue to practice, train, and improve.

--------------------------------------

Don't forget to check out my youtube channel!

Items that I like and recommend.

Sig P320: All the problems?

 I recently published two videos about the Sig P320 and the woes that platform is experiencing. The comments were all over the place, as one might imagine you would get from YouTube comments. Some accusation of me being a hater or such was definitely present, as well as the SiGsArEtHeBeStWhAtArEyOuTaLkInGaBoUt club. Look, from a purely outside perspective, I'll just say that the upside to the P320 platform is that it is quite easy to shoot.

I suspect, like many, that a lot of the claims of uncommanded discharges of the Sig P320 are actually user faults. If you give enough people a gun and ammo, sooner or later somebody is going to have a negligent discharge. And some of those people experiencing that issue will then blame the gun. But given the total number of issues here... well... I can't help but think there may be some fire associated with all the smoke.

Milwaukee PD is apparently emergency switching to Glock now, based on their issues. I know a federal agency that did the same several years ago because of the fits they were having with Sigs. 

Do I think the Sig is a bad gun? Nope. Do I trust it? Also nope.

The videos I did, in case you were wondering:

Short form video

Longer in-depth video

But I want all the upgrades!!!!!

I see a lot of posts on various groups asking about upgrades to Glocks. The problem, as always, is that people see some really cool looking stuff, and they want to have the same. Of course, if you are never going to shoot it or carry it for self defense, then you can certainly do all sorts of cosmetic upgrades, as well as anything else your heart desires.

The problem comes when you actually want to use the gun. Even if it is just for casual shooting or plinking, at some point upgrades can interfere with reliability. I've seen guns choke due to poor choices when it comes to recoil spring assemblies, firing pin springs, and trigger setups. If you don't mind and you like projects, then maybe none of this is a concern for you.

For a gun that I'm going to carry for real social purposes, I tend to limit my upgrades to the following:

1. Sights/Optics
2. Grip/Grip enhancements
3. Striker Control Device
4. Slide Stop/Slide Release
5. Minus Connector

Of course, if you are competing with it, then you'll probably want to consider, at a minimum:

1. Trigger Spring Change
2. Striker Spring Change
3. Trigger Bar/Shoe/Setup
4. Magazine Well
5. Aftermarket barrel/compensator

And if you want to spend some real cash:

• Slide cuts/lightening setup

Any cosmetic stuff that could be used in court should be strenuously avoided. Punisher backplates, etc., should definitely not be on a work or social gun.

No matter what, consider that any change made away from the original design will alter parameters of the gun's function. Maybe for good, maybe for neutral, and maybe for bad. Any change should be tested thoroughly before depending on it. Maybe you don't agree with my list regarding what I categorize as carry vs. competition. That's totally cool and at some point I may change my mind on some of it, but I tend to be somewhat conservative.

Canik Pistols: Too good to be true?

 I see a lot of people buying various Canik pistols and for many reasons. Some for fun, some for defensive purposes, and some for competition. The one example I tried was actually pretty accurate and it had a pretty decent trigger. I believe that one was marketed more toward the competition or faux competition crowd.

The issue I had with it: 3rd round out of the magazine nosedived and the gun choked up. Tap rack didn't fix it, I had to pull the magazine and screw with it before reseating it and running it. I only fired one magazine from it, but that one magazine convinced me that I wasn't interested in owning my own example of it.

The local range/fitness joint/gunshop carries several iterations of this pistol. If you go handle them they will doubtless feel pretty nifty. They also have all sorts of slide lightening cuts and gucci looking features, especially for their price point. 

I would, at least at this point, warn you away from them. Not that they may evolve into something decent with some time, but the ones I'm seeing and hearing about now are so-so in the reliability department. And they will doubtless suffer from issues when it comes to getting parts, which every gun will eventually need, at least if you do any serious shooting.